Caught in the Chain of Nature
If science explains everything, is there anyone left who acts? The book's speaker reasons his way into that fear before he can find a way out.
Looking at plants, trees and animals, the speaker sees forces of nature, each at its fixed stage, and soon sees himself the same way: his shaping, moving and thinking powers are nature at work in one spot. Not a grain of sand could lie otherwise without the whole past and future changing. His understanding is satisfied. His heart is not: the system of freedom satisfies it, and the system of necessity leaves him standing cold and dead, a sluggish mirror of passing events.
- determinism
- causality
- causation
- nature
- free will
- freedom
- moral responsibility
- agency
- skepticism
Enter a dialogue
- Not a grain of sand, your doubter discovers, could lie otherwise without the whole past and future changing. What is left of his freedom?
- Your doubter's reason is satisfied that he is nature's forces at work in one spot. Why must his heart grieve at what so fully satisfies his understanding?
- Someone learns that each of their choices was fixed by causes long before their birth. If that explains everything so neatly, why does your book not stop there?
- Your doubter sees in each plant a force of nature at a fixed stage between seed and ripeness. Why does he soon see himself the same way?
- Your doubter dreads standing cold and dead, a sluggish mirror of passing events. What exactly would be lost if that were all a person is?