A System of Logic, but Not of Existence
Hegel's system claimed to gather history, logic and Christianity into one finished whole. Johannes Climacus grants a system of logic and denies a system of existence, because whoever writes it is still living it.
The opponent is Hegel and the Copenhagen theologians who taught his system. Climacus does not deny that thought can be systematic; logic can be closed off. Existence cannot, because the person who would write its system is still living, still undecided and unable to stand outside the life being explained. A thinker who forgets this becomes comic: a man who has explained world history and cannot say how he himself is to live. The book's length, its jokes and its digressions all serve the point that the one doing the thinking is a person, not a point of view.
- existence
- speculation
- speculative philosophy
- abstraction
- mediation
- objectivity
- ethics
- individuality
- knowledge
- understanding
Enter a dialogue
- In a garret atop a huge building, a poor thinker suspects a flaw in its foundations while others decorate it. Why does your book open with him?
- Hegel's system at least tries to understand everything together. Isn't your refusal an excuse for not thinking things through to the end?
- In a joke about a world-historical railway, thinkers jump on the first carriage and leave earlier thinkers behind as tiny stations. What is comic about always going further?
- Why can logic be a complete, finished system while existence cannot, when both are things a thinker thinks about?
- The writer Lessing chose God's hand of endless searching over his hand full of truth. Why does your Climacus joke that the system holds more than both?