Despair, the Sickness One Cannot Die Of
Most people, Anti-Climacus argues, are in despair without knowing it, because they have never become aware of having a self. What would it mean to be a self at all, and how does a self fail?
He begins with a definition: the self is a relation that relates itself to itself and was established by another. A person holds together the finite and the infinite, the possible and the necessary, and has to keep holding them; despair is any failure in that balance. Some lose themselves in possibility, some in necessity, and most never notice they have a self to lose. Those who do notice may refuse to be themselves, or, most intensely, will to be themselves in defiance of the power that made them. What makes it the sickness unto death is that one cannot die of it.
- selfhood
- despair
- self-awareness
- consciousness
- possibility
- necessity
- spirit
- human nature
- self-deception
- immediacy
- defiance
- will
- self-knowledge
- spirituality
Enter a dialogue
- Why must a book on despair speak like a doctor at the sickbed rather than like a scholar at a distance?
- A man who will be Caesar or nothing is not made Caesar. Why does your pseudonym Anti-Climacus say he despairs over himself, not over failing?
- Someone refuses any self they were given and builds one entirely of their own design. Why is that the most intense despair, not freedom?
- Losing a limb or a spouse is noticed at once, yet losing oneself can pass as quietly as nothing. What makes that loss so easy to miss?
- Socrates proved the soul immortal because its sickness, wrongdoing, never consumes it. How does despair, which never consumes a person either, prove something eternal in us?