Contemporary with the One Who Invites
Come to me, all who labour and are heavily burdened. Anti-Climacus insists on asking who issues that invitation, and answers: not the glorious Christ of eighteen centuries of triumph, but a poor, mocked teacher no one could meet without the possibility of offence.
The history that separates a believer from Christ is, on this argument, no help and can be an obstacle. Eighteen centuries of success make it look as though the question has been settled, and it has not. To be a Christian is to become contemporary with the man in Roman Palestine, as if that history had not happened, and to face the choice his first listeners faced: to believe, or to take offence at a lowly man who was finally executed. Kierkegaard judged it the truest of all his books.
- offense
- religious offense
- incarnation
- christology
- divinity
- paradox
- faith
- humility
- suffering
- persecution
- compassion
- salvation
- love
- sin
- truth
Enter a dialogue
- Someone hears 'Come to me, all who labour and are heavily burdened' in church and feels soothed. Why does it matter who is speaking?
- Eighteen centuries of Christian history seem to prove Christianity true. Why should a believer set them aside and stand as if none of it had happened?
- A poor, mocked man says he is God. Why is faith possible only where taking offence at him is possible too?
- A fairground quack cries 'Come here, I cure every disease' to anyone who can pay. What makes Christ's own 'Come here, all' the opposite of that?
- History can supply endless facts about Jesus, yet your pseudonym Anti-Climacus says knowing destroys him as the object of faith. How can knowing more be a loss?