Can Anything Happen Twice?
The Greeks taught that learning is recollection, a return to what the soul already knew. Constantin Constantius proposes repetition as its modern counterpart, a return that moves forward, and then sets out to test it.
His test is almost comic. He travels back to Berlin to relive an earlier visit, with the same lodgings and the same farce at the same theatre, and finds that nothing comes again. The experiment fails because it treats repetition as something to be arranged from outside, the way a traveller arranges a trip, by a man who watches life rather than stakes himself in it. Whatever repetition turns out to be, it cannot be produced by a spectator. J. L. Heiberg's complaint that Constantin never separates repetition in nature from repetition in the life of the spirit points at the same gap.
- repetition
- memory
- temporality
- comedy
- theater
- observation
- experience
- imagination
- irony
- aesthetics
- aesthetic experience
Enter a dialogue
- Someone goes back to a place where they were once happy and finds that nothing there comes again. What has actually been lost?
- Your narrator Constantin returns to Berlin to relive a past visit and finds nothing repeats. Why is repetition more than a pleasant word for wishing?
- When philosophers denied that motion exists, Diogenes answered by silently walking back and forth. Why does the book open with him before asking whether repetition is possible?
- In this book hope slips away like a lovely girl, recollection is a fine old woman, and repetition is a wife one never tires of. Why a wife?
- Repetition and recollection are the same movement in opposite directions, the book says. What could it mean to remember something forwards?