Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing
Only the good can be willed wholeheartedly, because anything else divides the person who wants it. The first part asks a reader on the way to confession whether they will one thing, and catalogues the ways people will the good by halves.
Most of the discourse is a patient inventory of double-mindedness: willing the good for the reward, out of fear of punishment, for one's own advantage, or only up to a point. Each looks like goodness and each keeps something back. The confessional hour matters to the argument because it is the one place where a person stands before God alone, not as a member of a crowd, and Kierkegaard addresses the reader throughout as that single individual. He drafted it in the spring of 1846, weeks after Two Ages had described a public that answers for nothing.
- double-mindedness
- the good
- goodness
- will
- self-deception
- repentance
- confession
- conscience
- individuality
- eternity
- moral responsibility
- self-knowledge
- time
- responsibility
- freedom
Enter a dialogue
- Regret, you say, is a guide who limps behind our strong resolutions, grieving, yet a faithful friend. Why welcome the voice that reproaches us?
- Hardly anyone wills the good without some thought of reward or fear. Isn't one undivided will a demand no human being can meet?
- Repentance is owed at once, yet a person may ask time to prepare. When does preparing turn from honest to a way of putting it off?
- Someone who has done wrong and truly wills the good must even wish for punishment, as a patient accepts bitter medicine. Why?
- How can someone tell willing the good from willing it up to a point, when the two look identical until the point is reached?