Abraham Measured by Ethics
If ethics is the highest thing, Abraham on Mount Moriah is a man prepared to murder his son. Either there is a duty to God that suspends the ethical, or the church praises a killer every Sunday.
The ethics Johannes de silentio has in view is Hegel's, in which a person's highest duty is expressed in the shared life of family and state. On those terms a hero who sacrifices a child for the people can still be understood, and wept for. Abraham cannot: he acts for no shared purpose and can explain himself to no one, so he keeps silent on the three-day ride. The book calls the only alternative a teleological suspension of the ethical, and refuses to make it comfortable, since a man who claimed it wrongly would simply be a murderer.
- ethics
- ethical duty
- the universal
- the individual
- sacrifice
- silence
- paradox
- religious paradox
- responsibility
- tragedy
- heroism
- anxiety
Enter a dialogue
- A hero who sacrifices his child to save his people is wept for and understood. What puts Abraham, ready to kill Isaac at God's word, beyond that understanding?
- Your Johannes de silentio imagines Abraham telling Isaac 'I am an idolater, not your father', so Isaac blames him and not God. Why would that be kinder?
- A preacher praises Abraham on Sunday yet would denounce a parishioner who set out to sacrifice his own son. What does that say about the praise?
- Abraham rides three days to Mount Moriah in silence, telling no one what God has asked. Is that silence cruelty, or something faith forces on him?
- What do you say to someone whose deepest obligation cannot be explained to the very people closest to them?