The Teacher Who Must Give the Condition
If the truth is already in us, a teacher is only a midwife. Johannes Climacus asks what a teacher would have to be if the learner lacked the truth and even the capacity to receive it.
For Socrates the teacher is incidental: truth is drawn out of the learner by questioning, and the moment of learning leaves nothing behind. Climacus supposes the opposite and follows it strictly. A learner without the truth and without the condition for receiving it needs a teacher who supplies both, which only a god could do, and who must come in a form the learner can bear, as a king who loves a poor girl must come to her as an equal rather than in his crown. Not until the last paragraph does the book call its hypothesis Christianity.
- teaching
- recollection
- truth
- understanding
- knowledge
- divine love
- incarnation
- equality
- love
- revelation
- divine revelation
- sin
- discipleship
- paradox
Enter a dialogue
- Socrates held that the truth already lies inside every learner. What do you say to someone who looked inside and found only more confusion?
- Socrates trusted the learner enough to think the truth was already in him. Isn't insisting that a teacher must bring it an insult to human reason?
- A king who loves a poor girl cannot simply arrive in his crown. Why must he come to her as her equal?
- Unhappy love usually means lovers who cannot have each other. The book imagines a deeper sorrow, lovers who cannot understand each other. Why deeper?
- Thought's highest passion, the book claims, is to collide with what it cannot think, even at the cost of its own downfall. Why would reason want that?