WorkEdmund Burke

A Letter to William Elliot

Answering a duke's jibe reported in a newspaper, and rehearsing nine months early the invective of *A Letter to a Noble Lord*.

by Edmund Burke27 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 66)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

What reached Burke was a newspaper account of what the Duke of Norfolk had said about him in the House of Lords on 8 May 1795, in the debate over Lord Fitzwilliam's recall from Ireland. He answered on the 26th, in a letter to a friend that he then wrote as though it were a pamphlet. The charge, as printed, was that his alarms about religion and revolution were one man making a great deal of noise. He was sixty-six, out of Parliament, his only son nine months dead, and lately the loser of a seven-year impeachment. The reply accepts the description and defends it: a single voice raised early is often all the warning a country gets, and a warning nobody wants to hear is not thereby untrue. From there he turns to the ground he thought was really in dispute — that the French had gone for the religious establishment first and deliberately, because a church is the institution that teaches people their obligations did not begin with their own consent, and that England's establishment was carelessly defending something it had stopped noticing it possessed. The letter was not published in his lifetime. It reads as the rehearsal for the thing he wrote when the next attack came from a duke whose title he could take apart.

Key concepts

Who was the duke, and what had he said about Burke?

The Duke of Norfolk, speaking in the Lords on 8 May 1795 during the debate over Lord Fitzwilliam's recall from Ireland. Burke read the speech in a newspaper. The charge, as printed, was that his alarms about religion and revolution were one man making a great deal of noise. He answered on the 26th, in a letter to a friend that he then wrote as though it were a pamphlet.

A Letter to William Elliot, 26 May 1795

What does Burke concede by admitting he is a single voice?

He accepts the description instead of denying it. A single voice raised early is often all the warning a country gets, and a warning nobody wants to hear is not thereby untrue. The reply turns the sneer into the argument: standing alone is evidence about the audience, not about the alarm.

A Letter to William Elliot, on the charge of raising a solitary alarm

Why does Burke say the French attacked the church first?

Because a church is the institution that teaches people their obligations did not begin with their own consent. Going for the religious establishment was therefore deliberate and first, not incidental damage: it clears away the one authority that contradicts a politics founded on present will alone.

A Letter to William Elliot, on the attack upon the religious establishment

What is his complaint against the English establishment?

That it was carelessly defending something it had stopped noticing it possessed. The friends of the Church of England treated the establishment as scenery rather than as the thing under attack, and a defence conducted at that level of attention will not survive an enemy who knows exactly what he is destroying.

A Letter to William Elliot, on the defence of the English establishment

What happened to the letter afterwards?

It was not published in Burke's lifetime. He was sixty-six, out of Parliament, his only son nine months dead, and lately the loser of a seven-year impeachment. The letter reads as the rehearsal for the invective he produced nine months later, when the next attack came from a duke whose title he could take apart.

A Letter to William Elliot, written 1795 and printed posthumously

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Law, Custom, and Constitutional Judgment

Can legislation remake social order by design, or must law answer to precedent, inherited practice, and the judgment of institutions? The answer determines whether reform protects justice or loosens the restraints on power.

In a 1795 letter shaped by disputes over reform, Burke treats jurisprudence as a practical inheritance rather than a code that legislators can redesign at will. Precedent, prescription, equity, and the rule of law restrain avarice and arbitrary governance; juries and the judiciary turn those restraints into social protection. Marriage, property, and paternal authority extend the argument beyond criminal law: legal order depends on moral duties, reputation, and civility as well as enforcement. The result is a constitutional ethics of gradual judgment.

  • reputation
  • rule of law
  • rhetoric
  • monarchy
  • political authority
  • revolution
  • political institutions
  • political legitimacy
  • virtue
  • satire
  • authority
  • causation
  • corruption
  • form and substance
  • free will
  • historical change
  • moral responsibility
  • political action
  • political hypocrisy
  • political knowledge
  • political order
  • political reform
  • political responsibility
  • popular sovereignty
  • prudence
  • religion and politics
  • statesmanship
  • tradition
  • accountability
  • aristocracy

Within this work

passages held
27
distinct concepts
80
by passages held, corpus-wide
#261

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: jurisprudence with trial by jury.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 2 concepts, joined by 1 pairing. 2 shared passages in all.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
jurisprudencetrial by jury2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1756 A Vindication of Natural Society

    Published anonymously when its author was twenty-seven, and still argued over: a joke that a good many readers, then and since, have declined to take as one.

    EN
  2. 1757 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful)

    The one sustained work of philosophy in Burke's output, written before Parliament took him and revised only once.

    EN
  3. 1761 Hints for an Essay on the Drama

    An application of the Enquiry's aesthetics to a working art, abandoned after a few pages.

    EN
  4. 1765 Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws against Popery in Ireland

    Begun in Ireland in the early 1760s from inside the administration that enforced the penal code, then set aside unfinished for the sake of a career in England.

    EN
  5. 1769 Observations on a Late Publication on the Present State of the Nation

    A line-by-line rebuttal of another man's pamphlet, and the piece that converted Burke from a literary reputation into the Rockingham Whigs' pen.

    EN
  6. 1770 Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents

    The Rockingham Whigs' creed rather than one man's essay, circulated in draft for the party's approval.

    EN
  7. 1774 Speech on American Taxation

    The retrospective half of Burke's American case: where Conciliation proposes a settlement, this one explains how the quarrel was manufactured and by whom.

    EN
  8. 1774 Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at the Conclusion of the Poll

    Two speeches from one contested election in 1774 — the first on arriving mid-poll, the second on being declared elected — printed together ever since as a single statement.

    EN
  9. 1775 Speech on Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies

    Set as a school text in the United States for generations — and the speech where Burke stakes his whole case on describing a people rather than on a principle.

    EN
  10. 1777 A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol on the Affairs of America

    A constituency letter as much as a constitutional one, addressed to the officers of the city whose poll Burke would decline three years later.

    EN
  11. 1780 Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in 1780 (Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in)

    Written in the weeks after the Gordon Riots for the ministers deciding how many rioters to hang, and never intended for publication.

    EN
  12. 1780 Speech at the Guildhall in Bristol Previous to the Late Election

    The far end of the story begun at Bristol in 1774: the same doctrine of representation, restated by a man who was about to give up the seat for having acted on it.

    EN
  13. 1780 Speech on a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament and the Economical Reformation

    The high point of Burke's career as a practical reformer, and the rare instance of a proposal of his that became law — two years late, and in a smaller form than he moved.

    EN
  14. 1782 A Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws against Irish Catholics

    Prompted by the partial relief then before the Irish Parliament and addressed to the Catholic peer most inclined to be satisfied with it.

    EN
  15. 1783 Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill

    Where the case Burke had spent two years assembling was first made in public — the argument of his remaining years, delivered in support of somebody else's bill.

    EN
  16. 1784 A Representation to His Majesty

    A parliamentary address rather than a speech, drafted for a party that had just been destroyed at the polls, and published once the House declined to hear it out.

    EN
  17. 1788 Speeches in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings

    The labour of Burke's last fifteen years: a prosecution he lost, in a case that has outlasted its own verdict.

    EN
  18. 1789 A Letter to Charles-Jean-François Depont

    The seed of the Reflections, written a year earlier and at a fraction of the temperature — a private answer to the correspondent that famous book is still addressed to.

    EN
  19. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France

    The book the rest of this shelf is now read through, and the one that cost Burke his party, his closest friendship, and nearly every ally he had.

    EN
  20. 1790 Substance of the Speech on the Army Estimates

    The first of the French pamphlets: spoken in a supply debate that had nothing to do with France, nine months ahead of the Reflections.

    EN
  21. 1791 A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

    The Reflections carried one step further — the same diagnosis, now with Rousseau named as the author of the disease and foreign armies proposed as the cure.

    EN
  22. 1791 An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs

    The companion to the Reflections: where that book made the case, this one defends the man who made it — out of the Whigs' own precedents, and in the third person.

    EN
  23. 1791 Thoughts on French Affairs

    One of three memorials on France composed for the government rather than for readers, and printed by Burke's executors in the year he died.

    EN
  24. 1792 A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Roman Catholics of Ireland

    Timed for a relief bill coming before the Dublin Parliament and addressed to the member who would carry it, in the hope of enlarging the bill before it passed.

    EN
  25. 1792 A Letter to the Right Hon. Henry Dundas with a Sketch of a Negro Code

    Not an argument but a covering letter with a draft statute attached — written around 1780, sent to a Home Secretary twelve years later, and never introduced anywhere.

    EN
  26. 1793 A Letter to Richard Burke on Protestant Ascendency in Ireland

    The Irish argument compressed into a single phrase — a companion to the Langrishe letters, and the one that goes after the vocabulary of the settlement rather than its law.

    EN
  27. 1793 Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France

    The last of the three memorials Burke wrote for ministers on France, addressed to a government that took none of its advice, and printed after both the writer and the coalition were gone.

    EN
  28. 1794 Preface to the Address of M. Brissot to His Constituents

    Burke fronting somebody else's book — an English translation of a Girondin's self-defence, published the year after its author had been executed by his own revolution.

    EN
  29. 1795 A Letter to William Elliot you are here EN
  30. 1795 A Letter to William Smith on the Subject of Catholic Emancipation

    A letter rather than a pamphlet, and the most compact statement of his religious settlement Burke ever managed — written while he still believed the Irish question would be settled in his lifetime.

    EN
  31. 1795 Fourth Letter on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Numbered fourth and written first: a private version, addressed to a correspondent sacked that spring, of the case the Three Letters would put publicly a year later.

    EN
  32. 1795 Second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Catholic Question

    Second thoughts to the recipient of a famous first letter, three years on, after Earl Fitzwilliam's recall had killed the measure it argued for.

    EN
  33. 1795 Thoughts and Details on Scarcity

    The nearest thing to a treatise on economics Burke ever wrote, produced as advice to a prime minister during a famine and printed three years after his death.

    EN
  34. 1796 A Letter to a Noble Lord

    A personal answer to a personal attack, written eighteen months after his son's death, and the most admired single piece of writing in Burke's output.

    EN
  35. 1796 Three Letters on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Burke's last public argument, issued while the negotiation it attacked was under way, and in an eleventh edition before the year was out.

    EN
  36. Fragments and Notes of Speeches in Parliament

    Notes and unfinished passages that Burke preserved for a book he never wrote, printed after his death by his executors from the papers he left.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works