WorkEdmund Burke

Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill

Spoken for the bill George III destroyed by letting peers know privately that a vote for it would count as enmity to him.

by Edmund Burke118 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 54)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

George III put it about that any peer voting for this bill would be reckoned his enemy, and the Lords duly killed a measure the Commons had already passed. Opponents had called it a grab for patronage. Within days the coalition of Fox and North was dismissed, the younger Pitt was in office, and the election that followed swept Fox's party out for a generation. The bill would have taken the government of India away from the East India Company and vested it in seven commissioners named in the act itself. Burke supplied the case for it on 1 December 1783, out of two years spent on the Commons select committee reading the Company's own correspondence. What that reading exposed was not incompetence but a system — a chartered trading company wielding sovereign power over some thirty million people, answerable to nobody in Britain who could actually stop it, and raising revenue by means that would have been crimes in any jurisdiction that noticed them: a war fought against the Rohillas for hire, the stripping of the Raja of Benares, the squeezing of the Begums of Oudh. Against this he set the principle he would use for the next twelve years. All political power is held in trust for the people it is exercised on, and a charter cannot shelter power from that reckoning, because no charter can confer what nobody owned in the first place. The campaign this speech belongs to ended in the impeachment of Warren Hastings.

Key concepts

What made a trading company into a sovereign power?

A trading company became sovereign when it exercised the powers of a state: raising revenue, administering justice, making war, and governing territory. Burke insists that commercial origin cannot excuse political consequences. Once the Company ruled millions, its conduct had to meet public standards of legitimacy; profit could not serve as a substitute for accountable government.

Why does Burke call Britain responsible for Company rule?

Britain remained responsible because the Company governed under authority granted by the British state. Delegation did not erase responsibility. Burke therefore makes Indian administration a constitutional question at home: Parliament could not treat distant suffering as a merchant’s private affair when British power enabled the Company’s wars, revenues, and courts.

What does Burke defend in India’s inherited political order?

Burke defends inherited institutions, rights, and political arrangements as limits on sudden administrative redesign. He does not treat tradition as a blank cheque for every existing ruler; he uses it to oppose government that discards obligations whenever conquest or profit makes them inconvenient. Continuity supplies a standard by which imperial innovation can be judged.

Why does Burke fear parliamentary control over the Company?

Burke fears parliamentary control when it turns oversight into patronage: commissioners may replace one unaccountable interest with another. The danger lies in concentrating appointments, influence, and Indian revenue within a political faction. A remedy that makes government answer to party managers can preserve the appearance of reform while changing only the beneficiaries of power.

How does Burke connect political legitimacy with restraint in conquest?

Political legitimacy requires conquerors to restrain their power by law, treaty, and inherited obligation. Burke rejects the idea that victory dissolves the rights of those governed. In the speech, empire becomes a test of conduct after possession: authority must preserve the political order it claims to administer rather than convert superiority into permission.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Power Held in Trust

Can a state repair abused power without concentrating it in new hands, and what makes rule legitimate when the governed have no effective voice? The answer determines whether reform protects liberty or becomes factional seizure.

Burke accepts that the East India Company has abused the authority it exercises, but he rejects Fox’s remedy when it would place that authority under ministers and parliamentary commissioners answerable to faction rather than law. For him, sovereignty carries obligations: rulers must preserve inherited institutions, restrain corruption, and answer for subjects who cannot defend themselves. The speech therefore turns imperial reform into a constitutional test. Power cannot become legitimate merely by changing hands; it must be exercised as a trust.

  • governance
  • sovereignty
  • legitimacy
  • constitutionalism
  • accountability
  • corruption
  • political legitimacy
  • political ethics
  • factionalism
  • colonialism
  • imperialism
  • political corruption

Within this work

passages held
118
distinct concepts
302
by passages held, corpus-wide
#171

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: inheritance with tradition.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 7 pairings. 16 shared passages in all. 10 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
inheritancetradition3
legitimacytradition3
constitutionalisminheritance2
constitutionalismlegitimacy2
constitutionalismsovereignty2
hypocrisypolitical rhetoric2
legitimacypolitical rhetoric2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1756 A Vindication of Natural Society

    Published anonymously when its author was twenty-seven, and still argued over: a joke that a good many readers, then and since, have declined to take as one.

    EN
  2. 1757 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful)

    The one sustained work of philosophy in Burke's output, written before Parliament took him and revised only once.

    EN
  3. 1761 Hints for an Essay on the Drama

    An application of the Enquiry's aesthetics to a working art, abandoned after a few pages.

    EN
  4. 1765 Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws against Popery in Ireland

    Begun in Ireland in the early 1760s from inside the administration that enforced the penal code, then set aside unfinished for the sake of a career in England.

    EN
  5. 1769 Observations on a Late Publication on the Present State of the Nation

    A line-by-line rebuttal of another man's pamphlet, and the piece that converted Burke from a literary reputation into the Rockingham Whigs' pen.

    EN
  6. 1770 Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents

    The Rockingham Whigs' creed rather than one man's essay, circulated in draft for the party's approval.

    EN
  7. 1774 Speech on American Taxation

    The retrospective half of Burke's American case: where Conciliation proposes a settlement, this one explains how the quarrel was manufactured and by whom.

    EN
  8. 1774 Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at the Conclusion of the Poll

    Two speeches from one contested election in 1774 — the first on arriving mid-poll, the second on being declared elected — printed together ever since as a single statement.

    EN
  9. 1775 Speech on Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies

    Set as a school text in the United States for generations — and the speech where Burke stakes his whole case on describing a people rather than on a principle.

    EN
  10. 1777 A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol on the Affairs of America

    A constituency letter as much as a constitutional one, addressed to the officers of the city whose poll Burke would decline three years later.

    EN
  11. 1780 Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in 1780 (Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in)

    Written in the weeks after the Gordon Riots for the ministers deciding how many rioters to hang, and never intended for publication.

    EN
  12. 1780 Speech at the Guildhall in Bristol Previous to the Late Election

    The far end of the story begun at Bristol in 1774: the same doctrine of representation, restated by a man who was about to give up the seat for having acted on it.

    EN
  13. 1780 Speech on a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament and the Economical Reformation

    The high point of Burke's career as a practical reformer, and the rare instance of a proposal of his that became law — two years late, and in a smaller form than he moved.

    EN
  14. 1782 A Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws against Irish Catholics

    Prompted by the partial relief then before the Irish Parliament and addressed to the Catholic peer most inclined to be satisfied with it.

    EN
  15. 1783 Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill you are here EN
  16. 1784 A Representation to His Majesty

    A parliamentary address rather than a speech, drafted for a party that had just been destroyed at the polls, and published once the House declined to hear it out.

    EN
  17. 1788 Speeches in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings

    The labour of Burke's last fifteen years: a prosecution he lost, in a case that has outlasted its own verdict.

    EN
  18. 1789 A Letter to Charles-Jean-François Depont

    The seed of the Reflections, written a year earlier and at a fraction of the temperature — a private answer to the correspondent that famous book is still addressed to.

    EN
  19. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France

    The book the rest of this shelf is now read through, and the one that cost Burke his party, his closest friendship, and nearly every ally he had.

    EN
  20. 1790 Substance of the Speech on the Army Estimates

    The first of the French pamphlets: spoken in a supply debate that had nothing to do with France, nine months ahead of the Reflections.

    EN
  21. 1791 A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

    The Reflections carried one step further — the same diagnosis, now with Rousseau named as the author of the disease and foreign armies proposed as the cure.

    EN
  22. 1791 An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs

    The companion to the Reflections: where that book made the case, this one defends the man who made it — out of the Whigs' own precedents, and in the third person.

    EN
  23. 1791 Thoughts on French Affairs

    One of three memorials on France composed for the government rather than for readers, and printed by Burke's executors in the year he died.

    EN
  24. 1792 A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Roman Catholics of Ireland

    Timed for a relief bill coming before the Dublin Parliament and addressed to the member who would carry it, in the hope of enlarging the bill before it passed.

    EN
  25. 1792 A Letter to the Right Hon. Henry Dundas with a Sketch of a Negro Code

    Not an argument but a covering letter with a draft statute attached — written around 1780, sent to a Home Secretary twelve years later, and never introduced anywhere.

    EN
  26. 1793 A Letter to Richard Burke on Protestant Ascendency in Ireland

    The Irish argument compressed into a single phrase — a companion to the Langrishe letters, and the one that goes after the vocabulary of the settlement rather than its law.

    EN
  27. 1793 Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France

    The last of the three memorials Burke wrote for ministers on France, addressed to a government that took none of its advice, and printed after both the writer and the coalition were gone.

    EN
  28. 1794 Preface to the Address of M. Brissot to His Constituents

    Burke fronting somebody else's book — an English translation of a Girondin's self-defence, published the year after its author had been executed by his own revolution.

    EN
  29. 1795 A Letter to William Elliot

    The trial run for A Letter to a Noble Lord — the same posture at a smaller target, and not printed until after his death.

    EN
  30. 1795 A Letter to William Smith on the Subject of Catholic Emancipation

    A letter rather than a pamphlet, and the most compact statement of his religious settlement Burke ever managed — written while he still believed the Irish question would be settled in his lifetime.

    EN
  31. 1795 Fourth Letter on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Numbered fourth and written first: a private version, addressed to a correspondent sacked that spring, of the case the Three Letters would put publicly a year later.

    EN
  32. 1795 Second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Catholic Question

    Second thoughts to the recipient of a famous first letter, three years on, after Earl Fitzwilliam's recall had killed the measure it argued for.

    EN
  33. 1795 Thoughts and Details on Scarcity

    The nearest thing to a treatise on economics Burke ever wrote, produced as advice to a prime minister during a famine and printed three years after his death.

    EN
  34. 1796 A Letter to a Noble Lord

    A personal answer to a personal attack, written eighteen months after his son's death, and the most admired single piece of writing in Burke's output.

    EN
  35. 1796 Three Letters on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Burke's last public argument, issued while the negotiation it attacked was under way, and in an eleventh edition before the year was out.

    EN
  36. Fragments and Notes of Speeches in Parliament

    Notes and unfinished passages that Burke preserved for a book he never wrote, printed after his death by his executors from the papers he left.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works