WorkEdmund Burke

A Vindication of Natural Society

A parody of Bolingbroke so exact that Lord Chesterfield took it for the real thing — and anarchists have since reprinted it in earnest.

by Edmund Burke70 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 27)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

Bolingbroke's posthumous Philosophical Works appeared in 1754 and scandalised readers who had admired him as a statesman: the great orator, in print at last, turned his rhetoric against revealed religion. Two years later M. Cooper published what looked like another letter from the same dead hand, and it did to government exactly what Bolingbroke had done to the church. If reason can strip the mysteries from religion, the argument runs, then the same reason strips the state, and what is left is the record — the wars, the conquests, the courts, the labour of the poor — presented as a bill of costs that political society has never once justified. The author was Burke, twenty-seven and unknown, and he intended a reductio: push the fashionable method far enough and it demolishes everything, including the things nobody wants demolished. Enough readers missed it that he attached a preface to the second edition in 1757 explaining the joke. Chesterfield had been taken in; so, reportedly, had Bishop Warburton. The disclaimer did not retire the argument. Godwin read it with approval, and in 1958 the economist Murray Rothbard argued that the young Burke had meant every word and disowned it only once he wanted a career. Most scholars think the irony is real and sustained. Nobody has settled it from the text alone, which is a fair measure of how well the imitation was done.

Key concepts

What does the book mean by artificial society?

The book uses artificial society for political arrangements built by human authority, law, and coercion rather than ordinary social dependence. That label shifts the burden of proof: government cannot claim legitimacy merely because it is established; its institutions must justify the powers they exercise, especially taxation, punishment, and command. Establishment proves nothing.

How does the book use political history as evidence?

Political history functions as the book’s main test of legitimacy. Instead of beginning with a ruler’s title or a constitution’s age, it asks what governments have done: waged war, imposed burdens, and concentrated power. The record matters because political authority presents itself as protection; repeated violence exposes the gap between that promise and its effects.

Why does the book compare government with private wrongdoing?

Government magnifies private wrongdoing by giving it collective power. A thief harms individuals; a state can tax, punish, and wage war through offices that claim public necessity. The comparison does not make every private and public act identical. It attacks the moral exemption governments seek when legal authority turns coercion into policy.

What standard does the book use to judge political institutions?

The book judges political arrangements by their effects rather than their names or claims. Liberty and security count only when institutions actually protect them; sovereignty, representation, and constitutional form cannot settle the matter in advance. This standard asks who commands, who pays, and who suffers, then makes legitimacy answer to those consequences.

Is the book proposing the literal abolition of government?

The book’s extreme case against government works less as a practical programme than as a test of political justification. It pushes the appeal to natural society until inherited authority, coercion, and public necessity must defend themselves rather than rely on custom. The argument is therefore a pressure test, not a governing blueprint.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Natural Society Against Government

Can political society justify the powers it exercises over those who must obey it? The answer determines whether government protects liberty or converts authority, taxation, and coercion into organized oppression.

Writing in 1756, Burke presents political institutions as an accumulation of restraints rather than a natural remedy for human conflict. Government demands obedience, raises taxes, claims sovereignty, and can turn its authority toward war and tyranny; its legitimacy therefore cannot rest on power alone. By setting this burden against the relative simplicity of natural society, the argument attacks the assumption that established governance deserves automatic loyalty and leaves political strategy answerable to liberty.

  • liberty
  • coercion
  • sovereignty
  • tyranny
  • justice
  • war
  • human nature
  • political violence
  • despotism
  • democracy

Within this work

passages held
70
distinct concepts
181
by passages held, corpus-wide
#205

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: governance with representation.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 6 pairings. 13 shared passages in all. 11 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
governancerepresentation3
coercionconciliation2
coerciongovernance2
constitutionalismliberty2
constitutionalismpolitical representation2
libertypolitical representation2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1756 A Vindication of Natural Society you are here EN
  2. 1757 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful)

    The one sustained work of philosophy in Burke's output, written before Parliament took him and revised only once.

    EN
  3. 1761 Hints for an Essay on the Drama

    An application of the Enquiry's aesthetics to a working art, abandoned after a few pages.

    EN
  4. 1765 Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws against Popery in Ireland

    Begun in Ireland in the early 1760s from inside the administration that enforced the penal code, then set aside unfinished for the sake of a career in England.

    EN
  5. 1769 Observations on a Late Publication on the Present State of the Nation

    A line-by-line rebuttal of another man's pamphlet, and the piece that converted Burke from a literary reputation into the Rockingham Whigs' pen.

    EN
  6. 1770 Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents

    The Rockingham Whigs' creed rather than one man's essay, circulated in draft for the party's approval.

    EN
  7. 1774 Speech on American Taxation

    The retrospective half of Burke's American case: where Conciliation proposes a settlement, this one explains how the quarrel was manufactured and by whom.

    EN
  8. 1774 Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at the Conclusion of the Poll

    Two speeches from one contested election in 1774 — the first on arriving mid-poll, the second on being declared elected — printed together ever since as a single statement.

    EN
  9. 1775 Speech on Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies

    Set as a school text in the United States for generations — and the speech where Burke stakes his whole case on describing a people rather than on a principle.

    EN
  10. 1777 A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol on the Affairs of America

    A constituency letter as much as a constitutional one, addressed to the officers of the city whose poll Burke would decline three years later.

    EN
  11. 1780 Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in 1780 (Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in)

    Written in the weeks after the Gordon Riots for the ministers deciding how many rioters to hang, and never intended for publication.

    EN
  12. 1780 Speech at the Guildhall in Bristol Previous to the Late Election

    The far end of the story begun at Bristol in 1774: the same doctrine of representation, restated by a man who was about to give up the seat for having acted on it.

    EN
  13. 1780 Speech on a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament and the Economical Reformation

    The high point of Burke's career as a practical reformer, and the rare instance of a proposal of his that became law — two years late, and in a smaller form than he moved.

    EN
  14. 1782 A Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws against Irish Catholics

    Prompted by the partial relief then before the Irish Parliament and addressed to the Catholic peer most inclined to be satisfied with it.

    EN
  15. 1783 Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill

    Where the case Burke had spent two years assembling was first made in public — the argument of his remaining years, delivered in support of somebody else's bill.

    EN
  16. 1784 A Representation to His Majesty

    A parliamentary address rather than a speech, drafted for a party that had just been destroyed at the polls, and published once the House declined to hear it out.

    EN
  17. 1788 Speeches in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings

    The labour of Burke's last fifteen years: a prosecution he lost, in a case that has outlasted its own verdict.

    EN
  18. 1789 A Letter to Charles-Jean-François Depont

    The seed of the Reflections, written a year earlier and at a fraction of the temperature — a private answer to the correspondent that famous book is still addressed to.

    EN
  19. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France

    The book the rest of this shelf is now read through, and the one that cost Burke his party, his closest friendship, and nearly every ally he had.

    EN
  20. 1790 Substance of the Speech on the Army Estimates

    The first of the French pamphlets: spoken in a supply debate that had nothing to do with France, nine months ahead of the Reflections.

    EN
  21. 1791 A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

    The Reflections carried one step further — the same diagnosis, now with Rousseau named as the author of the disease and foreign armies proposed as the cure.

    EN
  22. 1791 An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs

    The companion to the Reflections: where that book made the case, this one defends the man who made it — out of the Whigs' own precedents, and in the third person.

    EN
  23. 1791 Thoughts on French Affairs

    One of three memorials on France composed for the government rather than for readers, and printed by Burke's executors in the year he died.

    EN
  24. 1792 A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Roman Catholics of Ireland

    Timed for a relief bill coming before the Dublin Parliament and addressed to the member who would carry it, in the hope of enlarging the bill before it passed.

    EN
  25. 1792 A Letter to the Right Hon. Henry Dundas with a Sketch of a Negro Code

    Not an argument but a covering letter with a draft statute attached — written around 1780, sent to a Home Secretary twelve years later, and never introduced anywhere.

    EN
  26. 1793 A Letter to Richard Burke on Protestant Ascendency in Ireland

    The Irish argument compressed into a single phrase — a companion to the Langrishe letters, and the one that goes after the vocabulary of the settlement rather than its law.

    EN
  27. 1793 Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France

    The last of the three memorials Burke wrote for ministers on France, addressed to a government that took none of its advice, and printed after both the writer and the coalition were gone.

    EN
  28. 1794 Preface to the Address of M. Brissot to His Constituents

    Burke fronting somebody else's book — an English translation of a Girondin's self-defence, published the year after its author had been executed by his own revolution.

    EN
  29. 1795 A Letter to William Elliot

    The trial run for A Letter to a Noble Lord — the same posture at a smaller target, and not printed until after his death.

    EN
  30. 1795 A Letter to William Smith on the Subject of Catholic Emancipation

    A letter rather than a pamphlet, and the most compact statement of his religious settlement Burke ever managed — written while he still believed the Irish question would be settled in his lifetime.

    EN
  31. 1795 Fourth Letter on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Numbered fourth and written first: a private version, addressed to a correspondent sacked that spring, of the case the Three Letters would put publicly a year later.

    EN
  32. 1795 Second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Catholic Question

    Second thoughts to the recipient of a famous first letter, three years on, after Earl Fitzwilliam's recall had killed the measure it argued for.

    EN
  33. 1795 Thoughts and Details on Scarcity

    The nearest thing to a treatise on economics Burke ever wrote, produced as advice to a prime minister during a famine and printed three years after his death.

    EN
  34. 1796 A Letter to a Noble Lord

    A personal answer to a personal attack, written eighteen months after his son's death, and the most admired single piece of writing in Burke's output.

    EN
  35. 1796 Three Letters on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Burke's last public argument, issued while the negotiation it attacked was under way, and in an eleventh edition before the year was out.

    EN
  36. Fragments and Notes of Speeches in Parliament

    Notes and unfinished passages that Burke preserved for a book he never wrote, printed after his death by his executors from the papers he left.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works