WorkEdmund Burke

A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

A French deputy asked what he made of the objections to the *Reflections*, and got two things that book had withheld: an indictment of Rousseau, and a call for invasion.

by Edmund Burke63 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 62)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

This is where Burke says in print that France should be invaded. The Reflections had described a catastrophe; the letter draws the conclusion. Written in January 1791 to a deputy who had asked what he made of the objections raised against that book, it argues that a doctrine recognising no frontier cannot be left undisturbed behind one, and that the powers of Europe will have to restore the French monarchy by force. Much of the letter is about a dead Genevan. Rousseau is the Assembly's real legislator, Burke argues, and not for the Social Contract: it is the Confessions and the cult of sentiment that did the work, teaching a generation to take the intensity of their own feelings as evidence of their virtue. A man who put his children into a foundling hospital and then wrote the century's great book on education was not being inconsistent. He had discovered that benevolence towards mankind at large costs less than kindness to any particular person, and a politics built on that discovery will be tender in its language and merciless in what it does. The letter was published later in 1791 and did him considerable harm: to Whigs already uneasy after the Reflections, a demand for a war of intervention confirmed everything they had begun to suspect. He had been asked about objections to a book. He answered with a plan for a coalition.

Key concepts

Why does Burke distrust political consistency in revolutionary arguments?

Burke treats political consistency as a test of revolutionary claims, not as a licence to remake every institution by one rule. In A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly, he compares the Assembly’s language of liberty with its attacks on monarchy, inherited authority, and established law. A government cannot call its destruction reform merely because one abstract principle runs through the argument.

What does Burke mean by necessity in political judgment?

Necessity names the pressure of circumstances that can justify departing from ordinary political rules; it does not mean whatever a faction declares urgent. Burke uses the idea to separate compelled action from ideological renovation. In judging the events of 1789–1791, he asks whether France faced a necessity that required constitutional destruction, or whether its leaders chose destruction in pursuit of a theory.

Why does Burke reject abstract rights as a political guide?

Burke rejects abstract rights when they operate without institutions, duties, or circumstances to give them political form. In 1791, he argues that announcing universal liberty cannot by itself establish a government capable of protecting it. Rights become politically useful only when constitutional arrangements, settled authority, and public allegiance translate them into obligations that rulers and citizens can actually recognise.

How does Burke distinguish resistance from rebellion?

Burke distinguishes resistance that restores constitutional authority from rebellion that transfers authority to a new power. The distinction turns on the object and limits of action, not on the word used to defend it. His appeal to Britain’s settlement of 1688 supports resistance as a remedy within a political order, while the French example presents resistance as a claim to refound sovereignty.

What does non-resistance mean in this letter?

Non-resistance does not require obedience to every ruler or make political judgment unnecessary. Burke treats it as a warning against turning opposition into a general right of rebellion. In the controversy surrounding the National Assembly in 1791, the question is whether resistance answers a specific constitutional injury or authorises citizens to dissolve allegiance whenever they condemn an existing government.

Why does Burke defend monarchy against the National Assembly?

Burke defends monarchy as a constitutional institution that concentrates allegiance and restrains the impulse to treat government as an invention of the present moment. His argument is not simply that kings are personally wise. In confronting the National Assembly’s settlement of 1791, he claims that removing monarchy also removes a source of continuity, authority, and political stability that abstract popular sovereignty cannot quickly replace.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Constitutional Continuity

Can a people remake government by principle alone, or must political judgment answer to inherited institutions, settled allegiance, and circumstance? The answer determines whether reform preserves liberty or turns resistance into revolution.

Burke attacks the French National Assembly for treating sovereignty and rights as inventions that can be applied without regard to precedent, authority, or political stability. A constitution, in his account, gathers obligations across generations; it cannot be rebuilt consistently from abstract premises while ignoring the practices that secure obedience and liberty. Reform therefore requires prudence, consensus, and moderation, whereas rebellion claims necessity and produces instability. His argument defends political continuity against revolutionary consistency.

  • constitutionalism
  • liberty
  • monarchy
  • rhetoric
  • political theory
  • rebellion
  • tradition
  • political reform
  • political judgment
  • rights
  • legitimacy
  • moderation
  • revolution
  • restoration
  • political legitimacy
  • tyranny
  • political prudence
  • political violence
  • moral psychology
  • education
  • family ethics
  • foreign intervention
  • international relations
  • political authority
  • political corruption
  • political power
  • property
  • religion and politics
  • representation
  • social order

Within this work

passages held
63
distinct concepts
143
by passages held, corpus-wide
#217

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: allegiance with resistance.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 7 pairings. 19 shared passages in all. 7 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
allegianceresistance3
consistencyliberty3
consistencyrhetoric3
necessitynon-resistance3
necessityresistance3
allegiancenecessity2
constitutionalismliberty2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1756 A Vindication of Natural Society

    Published anonymously when its author was twenty-seven, and still argued over: a joke that a good many readers, then and since, have declined to take as one.

    EN
  2. 1757 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful)

    The one sustained work of philosophy in Burke's output, written before Parliament took him and revised only once.

    EN
  3. 1761 Hints for an Essay on the Drama

    An application of the Enquiry's aesthetics to a working art, abandoned after a few pages.

    EN
  4. 1765 Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws against Popery in Ireland

    Begun in Ireland in the early 1760s from inside the administration that enforced the penal code, then set aside unfinished for the sake of a career in England.

    EN
  5. 1769 Observations on a Late Publication on the Present State of the Nation

    A line-by-line rebuttal of another man's pamphlet, and the piece that converted Burke from a literary reputation into the Rockingham Whigs' pen.

    EN
  6. 1770 Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents

    The Rockingham Whigs' creed rather than one man's essay, circulated in draft for the party's approval.

    EN
  7. 1774 Speech on American Taxation

    The retrospective half of Burke's American case: where Conciliation proposes a settlement, this one explains how the quarrel was manufactured and by whom.

    EN
  8. 1774 Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at the Conclusion of the Poll

    Two speeches from one contested election in 1774 — the first on arriving mid-poll, the second on being declared elected — printed together ever since as a single statement.

    EN
  9. 1775 Speech on Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies

    Set as a school text in the United States for generations — and the speech where Burke stakes his whole case on describing a people rather than on a principle.

    EN
  10. 1777 A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol on the Affairs of America

    A constituency letter as much as a constitutional one, addressed to the officers of the city whose poll Burke would decline three years later.

    EN
  11. 1780 Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in 1780 (Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in)

    Written in the weeks after the Gordon Riots for the ministers deciding how many rioters to hang, and never intended for publication.

    EN
  12. 1780 Speech at the Guildhall in Bristol Previous to the Late Election

    The far end of the story begun at Bristol in 1774: the same doctrine of representation, restated by a man who was about to give up the seat for having acted on it.

    EN
  13. 1780 Speech on a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament and the Economical Reformation

    The high point of Burke's career as a practical reformer, and the rare instance of a proposal of his that became law — two years late, and in a smaller form than he moved.

    EN
  14. 1782 A Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws against Irish Catholics

    Prompted by the partial relief then before the Irish Parliament and addressed to the Catholic peer most inclined to be satisfied with it.

    EN
  15. 1783 Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill

    Where the case Burke had spent two years assembling was first made in public — the argument of his remaining years, delivered in support of somebody else's bill.

    EN
  16. 1784 A Representation to His Majesty

    A parliamentary address rather than a speech, drafted for a party that had just been destroyed at the polls, and published once the House declined to hear it out.

    EN
  17. 1788 Speeches in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings

    The labour of Burke's last fifteen years: a prosecution he lost, in a case that has outlasted its own verdict.

    EN
  18. 1789 A Letter to Charles-Jean-François Depont

    The seed of the Reflections, written a year earlier and at a fraction of the temperature — a private answer to the correspondent that famous book is still addressed to.

    EN
  19. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France

    The book the rest of this shelf is now read through, and the one that cost Burke his party, his closest friendship, and nearly every ally he had.

    EN
  20. 1790 Substance of the Speech on the Army Estimates

    The first of the French pamphlets: spoken in a supply debate that had nothing to do with France, nine months ahead of the Reflections.

    EN
  21. 1791 A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly you are here EN
  22. 1791 An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs

    The companion to the Reflections: where that book made the case, this one defends the man who made it — out of the Whigs' own precedents, and in the third person.

    EN
  23. 1791 Thoughts on French Affairs

    One of three memorials on France composed for the government rather than for readers, and printed by Burke's executors in the year he died.

    EN
  24. 1792 A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Roman Catholics of Ireland

    Timed for a relief bill coming before the Dublin Parliament and addressed to the member who would carry it, in the hope of enlarging the bill before it passed.

    EN
  25. 1792 A Letter to the Right Hon. Henry Dundas with a Sketch of a Negro Code

    Not an argument but a covering letter with a draft statute attached — written around 1780, sent to a Home Secretary twelve years later, and never introduced anywhere.

    EN
  26. 1793 A Letter to Richard Burke on Protestant Ascendency in Ireland

    The Irish argument compressed into a single phrase — a companion to the Langrishe letters, and the one that goes after the vocabulary of the settlement rather than its law.

    EN
  27. 1793 Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France

    The last of the three memorials Burke wrote for ministers on France, addressed to a government that took none of its advice, and printed after both the writer and the coalition were gone.

    EN
  28. 1794 Preface to the Address of M. Brissot to His Constituents

    Burke fronting somebody else's book — an English translation of a Girondin's self-defence, published the year after its author had been executed by his own revolution.

    EN
  29. 1795 A Letter to William Elliot

    The trial run for A Letter to a Noble Lord — the same posture at a smaller target, and not printed until after his death.

    EN
  30. 1795 A Letter to William Smith on the Subject of Catholic Emancipation

    A letter rather than a pamphlet, and the most compact statement of his religious settlement Burke ever managed — written while he still believed the Irish question would be settled in his lifetime.

    EN
  31. 1795 Fourth Letter on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Numbered fourth and written first: a private version, addressed to a correspondent sacked that spring, of the case the Three Letters would put publicly a year later.

    EN
  32. 1795 Second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Catholic Question

    Second thoughts to the recipient of a famous first letter, three years on, after Earl Fitzwilliam's recall had killed the measure it argued for.

    EN
  33. 1795 Thoughts and Details on Scarcity

    The nearest thing to a treatise on economics Burke ever wrote, produced as advice to a prime minister during a famine and printed three years after his death.

    EN
  34. 1796 A Letter to a Noble Lord

    A personal answer to a personal attack, written eighteen months after his son's death, and the most admired single piece of writing in Burke's output.

    EN
  35. 1796 Three Letters on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Burke's last public argument, issued while the negotiation it attacked was under way, and in an eleventh edition before the year was out.

    EN
  36. Fragments and Notes of Speeches in Parliament

    Notes and unfinished passages that Burke preserved for a book he never wrote, printed after his death by his executors from the papers he left.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works