WorkEdmund Burke

A Letter to a Noble Lord

A duke attacked Burke's pension in the Lords; Burke replied by asking how the Russells had come to own their land.

by Edmund Burke63 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 67)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

The Duke of Bedford went after Burke's pension in the House of Lords in November 1795, and Lauderdale joined him on the first of December. The charge had a certain justice in it: the man who had spent thirty years denouncing the influence of the Crown had accepted a Crown pension the moment he left Parliament. The reply, published in February 1796, spends very little time defending the pension. It asks instead where the Duke's property came from. The Russells hold what they hold because the Crown handed their ancestor a share of the confiscated abbeys, in the largest redistribution of property England had seen since the Conquest. So the most magnificent critic of a pension in the kingdom is himself living on a Crown grant, at a scale no pension approaches — and every principle his French friends profess about inherited property would take his land long before it touched an old man's annuity. Under the invective is a bereavement. Burke's only son Richard had died in August 1794 at thirty-six; the pension was given to a man with nobody to leave anything to, and the letter says so, in the passage where the storm goes over him and lays him flat among the wreckage. It sold hard and reprinted repeatedly. It is generally reckoned the best prose he ever wrote, and he wrote it furious, at sixty-seven, with nothing left to be careful with.

Key concepts

Who was the noble lord, and what had he attacked?

The Duke of Bedford, who went after Burke's pension in the House of Lords in November 1795, with Lauderdale joining him on the first of December. The charge had a certain justice in it: the man who had spent thirty years denouncing the influence of the Crown had accepted a Crown pension the moment he left Parliament.

A Letter to a Noble Lord, February 1796

How does Burke answer the charge about his pension?

Barely by defending it. The letter spends very little time on the pension and asks instead where the Duke's property came from. The Russells hold what they hold because the Crown handed their ancestor a share of the confiscated abbeys, in the largest redistribution of property England had seen since the Conquest.

A Letter to a Noble Lord, on the origin of the Bedford estates

What does the grant of the abbeys prove about Bedford?

That the most magnificent critic of a pension in the kingdom is himself living on a Crown grant, at a scale no pension approaches. The difference between the Duke and the pensioner he denounces is one of size and of date, not of kind, and the older grant is by far the larger.

A Letter to a Noble Lord, on the Crown grant of the abbey lands

Does Burke want the Duke's estate taken away?

No, and that is the sharpest turn in the letter. The same long possession that secures the Russells secures every other title in the kingdom, an old man's annuity included. What he shows instead is that every principle his French friends profess about inherited property would take the Duke's land long before it touched that annuity.

A Letter to a Noble Lord, on what his French friends' principles would take

What loss lies under the invective?

Burke's only son Richard had died in August 1794 at thirty-six, so the pension was given to a man with nobody to leave anything to. The letter says so, in the passage where the storm goes over him and lays him flat among the wreckage. He wrote it furious, at sixty-seven, with nothing left to be careful with.

A Letter to a Noble Lord, on the death of his son

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Constitutional Legitimacy Against Revolution

The dispute turns on whether political legitimacy comes from present consent alone or from a constitutional inheritance that binds rulers and citizens. What hangs on the answer is the difference between reforming authority and destroying it.

Burke defends inherited constitutional authority against the claim that a new majority may refashion government at will. In answering the political charges directed at his conduct, he treats monarchy, aristocracy, and established institutions as parts of a covenant carried through history, not privileges awaiting popular cancellation. Revolution therefore appears as a breach of legitimacy rather than ordinary political change. Liberty survives through precedent, restraint, and moral duty; sovereignty without those limits becomes usurpation.

  • political legitimacy
  • constitutionalism
  • monarchy
  • tradition
  • revolution
  • aristocracy
  • liberty
  • merit
  • political violence
  • property
  • public service
  • political economy
  • political judgment
  • political reform
  • public finance
  • political prudence
  • social hierarchy
  • conservatism
  • hereditary privilege
  • honor
  • political leadership
  • political obligation
  • self-defense

Within this work

passages held
63
distinct concepts
184
by passages held, corpus-wide
#218

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: constitutionalism with legitimacy.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 3 pairings. 6 shared passages in all. 6 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
constitutionalismlegitimacy2
constitutionalismpolitical legitimacy2
historyinsurrection2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1756 A Vindication of Natural Society

    Published anonymously when its author was twenty-seven, and still argued over: a joke that a good many readers, then and since, have declined to take as one.

    EN
  2. 1757 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful)

    The one sustained work of philosophy in Burke's output, written before Parliament took him and revised only once.

    EN
  3. 1761 Hints for an Essay on the Drama

    An application of the Enquiry's aesthetics to a working art, abandoned after a few pages.

    EN
  4. 1765 Fragments of a Tract Relative to the Laws against Popery in Ireland

    Begun in Ireland in the early 1760s from inside the administration that enforced the penal code, then set aside unfinished for the sake of a career in England.

    EN
  5. 1769 Observations on a Late Publication on the Present State of the Nation

    A line-by-line rebuttal of another man's pamphlet, and the piece that converted Burke from a literary reputation into the Rockingham Whigs' pen.

    EN
  6. 1770 Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents

    The Rockingham Whigs' creed rather than one man's essay, circulated in draft for the party's approval.

    EN
  7. 1774 Speech on American Taxation

    The retrospective half of Burke's American case: where Conciliation proposes a settlement, this one explains how the quarrel was manufactured and by whom.

    EN
  8. 1774 Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at the Conclusion of the Poll

    Two speeches from one contested election in 1774 — the first on arriving mid-poll, the second on being declared elected — printed together ever since as a single statement.

    EN
  9. 1775 Speech on Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies

    Set as a school text in the United States for generations — and the speech where Burke stakes his whole case on describing a people rather than on a principle.

    EN
  10. 1777 A Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol on the Affairs of America

    A constituency letter as much as a constitutional one, addressed to the officers of the city whose poll Burke would decline three years later.

    EN
  11. 1780 Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in 1780 (Letters and Reflections on the Executions of the Rioters in)

    Written in the weeks after the Gordon Riots for the ministers deciding how many rioters to hang, and never intended for publication.

    EN
  12. 1780 Speech at the Guildhall in Bristol Previous to the Late Election

    The far end of the story begun at Bristol in 1774: the same doctrine of representation, restated by a man who was about to give up the seat for having acted on it.

    EN
  13. 1780 Speech on a Plan for the Better Security of the Independence of Parliament and the Economical Reformation

    The high point of Burke's career as a practical reformer, and the rare instance of a proposal of his that became law — two years late, and in a smaller form than he moved.

    EN
  14. 1782 A Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws against Irish Catholics

    Prompted by the partial relief then before the Irish Parliament and addressed to the Catholic peer most inclined to be satisfied with it.

    EN
  15. 1783 Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill

    Where the case Burke had spent two years assembling was first made in public — the argument of his remaining years, delivered in support of somebody else's bill.

    EN
  16. 1784 A Representation to His Majesty

    A parliamentary address rather than a speech, drafted for a party that had just been destroyed at the polls, and published once the House declined to hear it out.

    EN
  17. 1788 Speeches in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings

    The labour of Burke's last fifteen years: a prosecution he lost, in a case that has outlasted its own verdict.

    EN
  18. 1789 A Letter to Charles-Jean-François Depont

    The seed of the Reflections, written a year earlier and at a fraction of the temperature — a private answer to the correspondent that famous book is still addressed to.

    EN
  19. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France

    The book the rest of this shelf is now read through, and the one that cost Burke his party, his closest friendship, and nearly every ally he had.

    EN
  20. 1790 Substance of the Speech on the Army Estimates

    The first of the French pamphlets: spoken in a supply debate that had nothing to do with France, nine months ahead of the Reflections.

    EN
  21. 1791 A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

    The Reflections carried one step further — the same diagnosis, now with Rousseau named as the author of the disease and foreign armies proposed as the cure.

    EN
  22. 1791 An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs

    The companion to the Reflections: where that book made the case, this one defends the man who made it — out of the Whigs' own precedents, and in the third person.

    EN
  23. 1791 Thoughts on French Affairs

    One of three memorials on France composed for the government rather than for readers, and printed by Burke's executors in the year he died.

    EN
  24. 1792 A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Roman Catholics of Ireland

    Timed for a relief bill coming before the Dublin Parliament and addressed to the member who would carry it, in the hope of enlarging the bill before it passed.

    EN
  25. 1792 A Letter to the Right Hon. Henry Dundas with a Sketch of a Negro Code

    Not an argument but a covering letter with a draft statute attached — written around 1780, sent to a Home Secretary twelve years later, and never introduced anywhere.

    EN
  26. 1793 A Letter to Richard Burke on Protestant Ascendency in Ireland

    The Irish argument compressed into a single phrase — a companion to the Langrishe letters, and the one that goes after the vocabulary of the settlement rather than its law.

    EN
  27. 1793 Remarks on the Policy of the Allies with Respect to France

    The last of the three memorials Burke wrote for ministers on France, addressed to a government that took none of its advice, and printed after both the writer and the coalition were gone.

    EN
  28. 1794 Preface to the Address of M. Brissot to His Constituents

    Burke fronting somebody else's book — an English translation of a Girondin's self-defence, published the year after its author had been executed by his own revolution.

    EN
  29. 1795 A Letter to William Elliot

    The trial run for A Letter to a Noble Lord — the same posture at a smaller target, and not printed until after his death.

    EN
  30. 1795 A Letter to William Smith on the Subject of Catholic Emancipation

    A letter rather than a pamphlet, and the most compact statement of his religious settlement Burke ever managed — written while he still believed the Irish question would be settled in his lifetime.

    EN
  31. 1795 Fourth Letter on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Numbered fourth and written first: a private version, addressed to a correspondent sacked that spring, of the case the Three Letters would put publicly a year later.

    EN
  32. 1795 Second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Catholic Question

    Second thoughts to the recipient of a famous first letter, three years on, after Earl Fitzwilliam's recall had killed the measure it argued for.

    EN
  33. 1795 Thoughts and Details on Scarcity

    The nearest thing to a treatise on economics Burke ever wrote, produced as advice to a prime minister during a famine and printed three years after his death.

    EN
  34. 1796 A Letter to a Noble Lord you are here EN
  35. 1796 Three Letters on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France

    Burke's last public argument, issued while the negotiation it attacked was under way, and in an eleventh edition before the year was out.

    EN
  36. Fragments and Notes of Speeches in Parliament

    Notes and unfinished passages that Burke preserved for a book he never wrote, printed after his death by his executors from the papers he left.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works