Brave Men Who Cannot Define Bravery
Two decorated generals are asked to say what the courage they have lived by actually is — and the practice turns out not to be the understanding.
A plain question — should the boys train in armour? — Socrates turns steep: you cannot judge the training without knowing courage, its end. Laches offers standing firm, then endurance of soul; Nicias, more ambitiously, calls it knowledge of what is truly to be feared. Each falls, and three capable men admit they cannot define what they have spent their lives doing. The unresolved close is the point: being good at something is not understanding it. Nicias' answer leans toward the claim that the virtues finally reduce to wisdom.
- virtue
- courage
- definition
- education
- expertise
- wisdom
- knowledge
- epistemology
- fear
- ignorance
- hope
- military education
- parental responsibility
- deliberation
- moral education
Enter a dialogue
- A soldier has been brave all his life yet cannot say what courage is. Does that ignorance take anything from him?
- Standing firm in the ranks, says the general Laches, is courage. Scythian riders fight while retreating, and Spartans once fled, then turned and won. Were they cowards?
- Laches says courage is endurance of the soul. Why does your Socrates answer that foolish endurance, which does harm, cannot count as courage?
- Your general Nicias holds courage is knowing what is truly to be feared. Must a fearless child or a wild beast count as senseless rather than brave?
- Having failed to define courage, your Socrates tells the fathers and generals to go back to school with the boys. Why is that the honest conclusion?